The Digital Asset Market Readability Act, higher referred to as the CLARITY Act, was supposed to attract clear traces round crypto property and which regulator will get the primary name.
CryptoSlate has already walked readers by way of the invoice’s bigger structure forward of the January markup, together with what modified, what stayed unresolved, and why jurisdiction and state preemption might matter as a lot because the headline definitions.
The half consuming essentially the most oxygen proper now’s narrower and far more nuanced: it's about who pays shoppers to maintain {dollars} parked in a specific place.
Related Reading Washington’s new crypto bill would strip states of power – legally bans oversight that catches front-end manipulation
Crypto’s biggest U.S. problem has always been jurisdiction. The CLARITY Act aims to end the SEC–CFTC tug-of-war, while opening a new fight over DeFi and state preemption.
Jan 4, 2026 · Andjela Radmilac
That dispute turned tougher to disregard after Coinbase stated it couldn't help the Senate draft in its present type, and the Senate Banking Committee postponed a deliberate markup. Since then, the invoice has shifted into the section the place employees rewrite verbs, and lawmakers check whether or not a brand new coalition is actual.
Senate Democrats stated they might hold speaking with trade representatives about issues, whereas the Senate Agriculture Committee pointed to a parallel schedule, together with their Jan. 21 draft and a listening to scheduled for Jan. 27.
If you would like the only technique to perceive why stablecoin rewards turned the tripwire, overlook the slogans and film one display: a consumer sees a greenback steadiness labeled USDC or one other stablecoin and a suggestion to earn one thing for conserving it there. In Washington, that “one thing” is curiosity. In banking, “there” is an alternative to deposits.
Within the Senate draft, the battle is concentrated in Section 404, titled “Preserving rewards for stablecoin holders,” a bit that primarily tells platforms what they’ll and can’t do.
The road Congress is making an attempt to attract
Part 404 says digital asset service suppliers can't present any type of curiosity or yield that's “solely in reference to the holding of a cost stablecoin.”
That targets the only rewards product: park a cost stablecoin on an change or in a hosted pockets and obtain a quoted return that accrues over time, with no extra conduct required. That appears like curiosity to lawmakers, and it appears like a direct funding competitor to banks that depend on deposits.
The important thing phrase right here is “solely in reference to the holding,” because it makes the ban depend upon causality. If the one purpose a consumer receives worth is that they maintain the stablecoin, the platform is out of bounds. If a platform can credibly tie the worth to one thing else, the draft presents a path ahead.
CLARITY tries to outline that path by permitting “activity-based rewards and incentives,” then itemizing what that exercise can embody: transactions and settlement, utilizing a pockets or platform, loyalty or subscription applications, service provider acceptance rebates, offering liquidity or collateral, and even “governance, validation, staking, or different ecosystem participation.”
Put merely, Part 404 is separating being paid for parking from being paid for participation. In product language, it invitations a second struggle over what counts as participation, as a result of fintech has spent a decade studying the best way to convert economics into engagement with just a few further faucets.
Related Reading The US Senate could wipe out $6 billion in crypto rewards this week by closing one specific loophole
Banks want the “affiliate loophole” closed; exchanges say that turns lawful loyalty incentives into an illegal end-run overnight.
Jan 13, 2026 · Gino Matos
The elements customers will truly discover
Most readers will concentrate on the yield ban and overlook the layer that would reshape the entrance finish of stablecoin merchandise: advertising and marketing and disclosures.
Part 404 prohibits advertising and marketing that implies a cost stablecoin is a financial institution deposit or FDIC insured, that rewards are “risk-free” or similar to deposit curiosity, or that the stablecoin itself is paying the reward. It additionally pushes towards standardized plain-language statements {that a} cost stablecoin isn't a deposit and isn't government-insured, plus clear attribution of who’s funding the reward and what a consumer should do to obtain it.
Banks and credit score unions care about notion as a result of notion is what strikes deposits. Their public argument is that passive stablecoin yield encourages shoppers to deal with stablecoin balances like secure money, which might speed up deposit migration, with group banks taking the hit first.
The Senate draft validates that concern by requiring a future report on deposit outflows and explicitly calling out deposit flight from group banks as a danger to review.
Nevertheless, crypto corporations say that stablecoin reserves already generate revenue, and platforms need flexibility to share a few of that worth with customers, particularly in merchandise that compete with financial institution accounts and cash market funds.
Probably the most helpful query we will ask here’s what survives this invoice and in what type.
A flat APY for holding stablecoins on an change is the high-risk case, as a result of the profit is “solely” tied to holding, and platforms will want a real exercise hook to maintain that going.
Cashback or factors for spending stablecoins is far safer, as a result of service provider rebates and transaction-linked rewards are explicitly contemplated, and that tends to favor playing cards, commerce perks, and varied different “use-to-earn” mechanics.
Collateral or liquidity-based rewards are doubtless attainable as a result of “offering liquidity or collateral” seems within the checklist, however the UX burden rises there as a result of the chance profile appears extra like lending than funds. DeFi pass-through yield inside a custodial wrapper stays attainable in principle.
Nevertheless, platforms received't be capable to keep away from disclosures, and disclosures create friction, as a result of platforms should clarify who's paying, what qualifies, and what dangers exist in a approach that can be examined in enforcement and in courtroom.
The throughline is that Part 404 nudges rewards away from idle steadiness yield and towards rewards that appear like funds, loyalty, subscriptions, and commerce.
Related Reading Banks are lobbying to kill crypto rewards to protect a hidden $1,400 “tax” on every household
They earn $176B on Fed reserves and $187B in swipe fees, and now they’re lobbying to shut the rewards door.
Jan 10, 2026 · Gino Matos
The issuer firewall and the phrase that may determine partnerships
Part 404 additionally features a clause that doesn't appear like a lot till you place it subsequent to real-world stablecoin distribution offers. It says a permitted cost stablecoin issuer shouldn’t be deemed to be paying curiosity or yield simply because a 3rd social gathering presents rewards independently, except the issuer “directs this system.”
That is the invoice’s try and hold issuers from being handled like interest-paying banks as a result of an change or pockets layered incentives on prime. It additionally warns issuers to watch out about how shut they get to platform rewards, as a result of that closeness can simply be seen as course.
“Directs this system” is the primary hinge right here. Route can imply formal management, however the onerous circumstances are affect that appears like management from the surface: co-marketing, income shares tied to balances, technical integrations designed to help a rewards funnel, or contractual necessities about how a platform describes the stablecoin expertise.
After Coinbase’s objection and the markup delay, that ambiguity turned the battleground, as a result of late-stage invoice work usually comes down as to if a single phrase is narrowed, broadened, or outlined.
Related Reading 
Coinbase accused of performing a “rug pull” as the White House weighs killing the CLARITY Act over yield
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong denies a White House "war" while Terrett reveals the banks' secret demand.
Jan 19, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright
Probably the most believable endpoint is, sadly, not a clear victory for both facet. The market will more than likely see a brand new regime applied the place platforms nonetheless provide rewards, however they accomplish that by way of activity-based applications that appear like funds and engagement mechanics, whereas issuers hold their distance except they're ready to be handled as contributors within the compensation construction.
That's why Part 404 issues past the present information cycle. It's about which rewards will be supplied at scale with out stablecoins being offered as deposits by one other identify, and about which partnerships can be deemed to cross the road from distribution into course.
The put up Will your crypto rewards survive upcoming CLARITY regulation? A plain-English information to Part 404 appeared first on CryptoSlate.