White Home stablecoin assembly may unfreeze the CLARITY Act, however your USDC rewards stands out as the worth
The newly confirmed Feb. 10 White Home assembly on stablecoin coverage is being framed by some market observers as a step towards breaking the logjam across the CLARITY Act, a broad crypto market-structure invoice that has already run into procedural hurdles within the Senate.
In a submit on X, Milk Street mentioned the White Home convening may assist transfer H.R. 3633 ahead after disputes over whether or not stablecoin holders ought to obtain interest-like returns.
The Senate Banking Committee’s deliberate Jan. 15 government session to think about H.R. 3633 was publicly listed as “POSTPONED,” leaving the invoice with no present markup date on the committee calendar.
The committee had beforehand introduced it will maintain a markup that day on complete digital asset market construction laws. The announcement created an specific before-and-after second for the business’s near-term legislative timeline.
As that markup slipped, a White Home-led stakeholder assembly on Feb. 2 ended with out settlement on stablecoin yield or rewards, with individuals planning to proceed talks.
Expectations at the moment are set for one more incremental spherical slightly than a single definitive negotiation. For extra context on how the dispute is being framed in crypto media, see CryptoSlate’s protection of the White Home deposit-flight/yield standoff.
Related Reading White House sets February deadline to settle $6.6 trillion fight between Coinbase and banks
Even “crypto” is split now, and the winner sets the template for every future fight on custody, DeFi, and taxes.
Feb 4, 2026 · Gino Matos
Stablecoin “yield” and the bank-deposit battle
The yield dispute is tied to product economics which are already seen in shopper gives. Coinbase advertises “3.50% rewards on USDC” as a part of Coinbase One, whereas disclosing that the rewards price is topic to alter and might differ by area.
These caveats make “yield” much less a protocol-level function than a distribution resolution and a compliance selection. The coverage argument activates whether or not payouts are handled as a rebate or loyalty profit, a bank-like curiosity substitute, or a yield product that attracts securities-style scrutiny.
The Wall Avenue Journal, describing the bank-crypto conflict over these merchandise, contrasted stablecoin rewards round 3.5% with financial institution deposit charges round 0.1%. It additionally reported that the Treasury had estimated a possible $6.6 trillion drawdown in deposits underneath sure assumptions, a determine greatest handled as a state of affairs output slightly than an noticed circulate.
Bloomberg Regulation’s reporting described the difficulty as unresolved even after the White Home convened stakeholders. Associated: CryptoSlate’s prior protection of USDC rewards modifications underneath MiCA-aligned guidelines.
Related Reading Coinbase to halt USDC earn program on MiCA compliant regions
The exchange mentions the new requirements for e-money tokens as the reason behind the USDC-related service shutdown.
Nov 28, 2024 · Gino Matos
| Information level | What’s on the document | Why it issues for the invoice battle |
|---|---|---|
| USDC rewards provide | Coinbase markets “3.50% rewards on USDC,” with rate-change and area caveats | Provides lawmakers and financial institution regulators a concrete reference for “interest-like” distribution |
| Financial institution vs. stablecoin price framing | WSJ reported ~3.5% stablecoin rewards vs. ~0.1% financial institution deposit charges | Frames stablecoin balances as competitors for deposits and financial institution funding prices |
| Deposit draw state of affairs | WSJ reported a Treasury estimate of $6.6T in potential deposit drawdown | Pushes the dispute from shopper advertising and marketing into systemic-scale coverage debate |
What the CLARITY Act textual content does on custody and DeFi
The legislative automobile on the middle of the controversy is H.R. 3633, which handed the Home and was despatched to the Senate, the place it was acquired and referred to the Senate Banking Committee on Sept. 18, 2025.
The invoice textual content contains an specific “Safety of Self-Custody” clause. It states customers retain the correct to keep up {hardware} or software program wallets and to interact in direct peer-to-peer transactions, language that turns into a measuring stick for whether or not a closing compromise protects retail custody decisions whereas regulating intermediaries.
The Home textual content additionally contains headings that carve out “DECENTRALIZED FINANCE ACTIVITIES NOT SUBJECT TO THIS ACT” in modification sections touching each the Securities Change Act and the Commodity Change Act. That makes DeFi scope a drafting problem slightly than an afterthought within the Home method.
For readers monitoring broader DeFi coverage debates, see CryptoSlate’s evaluation on DeFi adoption and 2026 regulatory strain.
Related Reading Will DeFi adoption officially end in 2026?
MiCA may stifle crypto growth while favoring larger entities through regulatory hurdles and centralization.
Jan 2, 2026 · Shane Neagle
The ahead path now hinges on how negotiators classify stablecoin rewards and the way that classification carries by means of committee textual content. One base-case final result in step with public reporting is continuation of talks that yields a partial compromise.
Underneath that path, packages branded as “rewards” may survive if tied to exercise or membership constructs, whereas “passive” balance-based payouts are constrained by statutory definitions or implementing guidelines. That might shift product design towards funds rails, card packages, and utilization incentives slightly than a easy APY for holding.
A extra optimistic state of affairs relies on a reputable yield compromise decreasing sufficient opposition for Senate Banking to re-calendar its markup. As of Feb. 9, no new date was posted to exchange the postponed Jan. 15 session, leaving timing depending on future committee motion slightly than a set schedule.
A draw back path is that stablecoin yield stays a veto level, extending the hole between Home-passed textual content and a Senate course of that has already proven slippage. For associated debate on yield-bearing stablecoins in Congress, see CryptoSlate’s earlier protection of the STABLE Act markup controversy.
Related Reading House Committee to review STABLE Act amid controversy over yield-bearing stablecoins ban
The markup could discuss an amendment on the prohibition regarding yield-bearing stablecoins.
Apr 1, 2025 · Gino Matos
World constraints, implementation threat, and what to look at subsequent
For DeFi and retail customers, the sensible check will likely be whether or not statutory carve-outs and self-custody protections stay intact after Senate drafting and any Home-Senate reconciliation. The Home language on self-custody and peer-to-peer transfers is specific within the present textual content.
That gives a foundation for evaluating later variations that may slender pockets rights by means of definitions of intermediated companies or compliance triggers. The DeFi carve-out headings present one other anchor, however their actual impact can hinge on how lawmakers and companies outline “DeFi actions,” “management,” and intermediation.
That implementation threat issues extra if stablecoin rewards are regulated broadly. In that case, on-ramps, custodians, and interfaces develop into choke factors for the way yield-like worth reaches customers, even when the yield itself comes from outdoors the stablecoin issuer’s stability sheet.
The U.S. negotiation additionally sits towards a world baseline the place no less than one main jurisdiction has already set constraints on “curiosity” for sure crypto-asset tokens. The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Property Regulation offers a reference level for limiting interest-like advantages in components of the stablecoin class.
U.S. drafters face a aggressive tradeoff between aligning with a restrictive mannequin and allowing a rewards channel that features as money administration for crypto-native and fintech distribution. For extra MiCA context, see CryptoSlate’s reporting on MiCA licensing throughout the EU.
Related Reading 
EU grants MiCA licenses to 53 crypto firms, Tether and Binance left behind
More than 50 firms have secured MiCA licenses, bypassing jurisdictional hurdles across 30 EEA countries.
Jul 7, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo
For now, the following concrete alerts to look at are whether or not the reported Feb. 10 assembly happens and produces draft language that resolves the Feb. 2 impasse.
One other key marker is whether or not Senate Banking posts a brand new date to exchange the postponed Jan. 15 markup that was meant to think about H.R. 3633.
The submit White Home assembly may unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, however crypto rewards prone to be the value appeared first on CryptoSlate.